Who Is the Killer in Righteous Kill Review
Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino, actors of the about classic and memorable films now practise a mediocre thriller
Righteous Impale is 1 of those films that a lot of people take just been looking forwards too because it has two of the greatest actors of our generation, Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino. I must add how I love in a lot of the TV advertising's they're saying this is their first pic together, truthful, information technology'due south the start time they are real co-stars together, just they've had two films already. Anyways, back onto the film, Robert and Al are both incredible actors, we know that, Robert is really my favorite player, so naturally I was looking forward to seeing this movie, I hate to say this, oh, man, I detest to say this, simply this film was an utter disappointment. I'm not saying this was a bad film, but this was a sad and very predictable thriller that could have been done with more than average actors, Al and Robert are higher up this script and don't pull in their best performances due to that. The story is very mediocre compared to some of these terrific actors who looked so bored throughout the move.
Turk and Rooster are partners on the law force, having experienced over xxx years of constant bad guys going free, seeing the innocent's blood shed, and all the injustice in the globe, they've almost lost information technology. Suddenly, in that location are murders involving the criminals they have arrested, along with younger officers, they endeavor to figure out what is going on, but when ane of the cops brings up that it might be a vigilante state of affairs, Turk and Rooster are hesitant. Peradventure they're hiding some secrets of their own.
Righteous Impale, don't go me wrong, information technology's worth the look, peculiarly to see these cinematic legends on screen together, but like I said, for the script they were given, this was way too average and they are above it. I even hate to say it, this was very anticipated if yous've seen a lot of these thriller movies of today. Not to mention, I think Al Pacino, this must have been his third movie where he has worn that same leather jacket, I mean is it but me, or does anyone else observe this? Over all, information technology's not a bad movie, but it could take just been done with average actors, instead of all the hype that has been around information technology because of the actors. Merely don't be fooled, it's a typical thriller, nothing special, I suggest waiting for the rental.
half dozen/10
259 out of 324 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Acting, Very Weak Script
Turk (Robert De Niro) and Rooster (Al Pacino) are longtime NYC constabulary partners, in this Jon Avnet thriller that has them trying to stop an unknown serial killer, a person who leaves a verse form at the scene of each crime. Victims are law-breakers who were freed on legal technicalities. Ii other cops, played past John Leguizamo and Donnie Wahlberg, become suspicious of the investigation, and this hampers the efforts of Turk and Rooster.
The script on which the film is based is rather poor. The setup is muddled; none of the characters are specially sympathetic, and secondary characters are not well defined. Farther, "Righteous Kill" is not that much dissimilar from other serial killer or urban crime films.
The mood hither is dark, and the tone is rather cynical. Characters go out of their way to telegraph their toughness past using lots of "hard" language. In that location'due south an edginess to the characters, and that's okay. Only I could take wished for a character with some degree of softness. That would have provided much needed balance to the overall tonal savagery.
Without a doubt, the film'due south best element is the acting. In that location's not a weak performance in the bunch. Of course, the focus is on De Niro and Pacino. This is actually their film. And it's their esprit, their dorsum and forth playful banter, that makes the film worth watching. Production pattern and costumes are credible. Color cinematography is more often than not nighttime, consequent with the story'south mood.
In spite of a weak script, "Righteous Impale" does provide some adept plot misdirection that will leave viewers unsure equally to the story's outcome. But the film'due south main virtue is the casting of De Niro and Pacino, two contemporary screen legends whose performances here are quite adept.
181 out of 242 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Lack Of Forensic Clues
When Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro teamed for the showtime time in Heat the main complaint from fans was that there was not enough screen time for them together. In fact the one scene in that picture that had them together was shoe horned into the moving picture. It had to be because in that 1 the 2 were on contrary sides of the police.
No trouble on that score here considering in Righteous Kill, Pacino and DeNiro play a pair of veteran police detectives who have the chore very seriously indeed. What they're working on now is every bit the leads in team that is tracking down a series killer who likes to exit little poetical epitaphs behind for each victim.
The plot here is borrowed from Magnum Force, simply in that film, Hal Holbrook has recruited a personal death squad from among the immature officers of the San Francisco PD. and Clint Eastwood equally Dirty Harry is trying to solve the case. When these guys exercise figure it out that it's a cop doing the killing, it'southward one individual however doing it on their own.
This is non a harmonious team that Lieutenant Brian Dennehy has put together. Carla Gugino is trying to bear witness she's as tough as the men and a couple of younger detectives, John Leguizamo and Donnie Wahlberg are wanting bad to show upwardly the older Pacino and DeNiro.
Righteous Kill is pure gold when the two acting legends are on the screen together. When the attention is not on them yet, the story does drag a fleck in spots. In fact the very lack of forensic clues at the offense scenes should take alerted this squad as to where to look for the killer.
Yet no opportunity to see Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro for the cost of one ticket should exist missed.
14 out of 17 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disappointing thriller from legendary actors
Alert: Spoilers
Surely with a movie that stars both Al Pacino & Robert de Niro, you merely can't go wrong? Both are legends of the big screen, and both are lauded for making legendary roles their own.
Yet sadly with "Righteous Kill" information technology merely doesn't pay off. It's a thriller effectually a serial killer of various nefarious characters (pimps, drug dealers etc). The movie begins with a confession by de Niro (a cop) that he is the killer, and we are led on a journeying as he and his partner (Pacino) fight off another pair of cops who are suspicious that the trail leads to de Niro.
Having starred together in Estrus, you'd expect some loftier standards, but for some reason the chemical science here simply doesn't piece of work and at points yous call back they really aren't interested. Fellow actors aren't too potent either, and much of the activity seems to exist just going with the flow. The storyline is interesting enough (with a good finale) but never seems to grip you through much of the picture show.
Overall, its a disappointment and yous look better from a film that has de Niro & Pacino together in it.
69 out of 89 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mate
Alarm: Spoilers
Greetings again from the darkness. Yes, it is cool to see Deniro and Pacino on screen together again and it'due south inexcusable that it didn't happen a few more than times over the years. Merely cool casting lonely does non brand a movie. Managing director Jon Avnet ("88 Minutes", "Fried Green Tomatoes") and writer Russell Gewirtz ("Inside Man") have discovered that.
On a brilliant notation, Avnet somehow managed to avoid the whiny, screaming Pacino that we have been subjected to so many times these past few years. Instead nosotros get a guy drifting through the film as if drugged like a hyper-active kid. DeNiro on the other hand does all he tin can do to exist the tough, aging cop. Nosotros are treated to the facials, manus gestures and summit notch line deliveries that we have come to expect.
The two legends are joined past rival partners John Leguizano and Donnie Wahlberg, who are convinced that Deniro'south Turk is a serial killer. Their captain in this is the rarely seen Brian Dennehy. DeNiro's character somehow is hooked up with the department ME played scorchingly by Carla Gugino, who in real life would undoubtedly be cheating on her multi-millionaire husband and not working for a living. Nigh as a story line toss-in, rapper 50 Cent plays a drug dealing guild owner who tries to play ball with the cops. Likewise want to mention that Alan Rosenberg has a small function and offers a reminder of his skills, which take been rarely seen since he became President of SAG.
The moving picture has many twists and turns and diversions, but there really is no doubt who the serial killer is. The video of DeNiro patently confessing to the crime was actually a good idea and some of his best work. As with "88 Minutes", I am simply non pleased with Avnet's directorial style. The attempts to shoot cool shots and toss in some quick focus just requite it the look of someone trying also difficult to exist Scorcese. Still, it is worth seeing for DeNiro but you probably won't be surprised.
While certainly watchable, this one is just not quite as smart equally it tries to be.
24 out of 35 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Similar Lennon and McCartney... sure, if not with the all-time director
Righteous Impale is a kind of prototypical modern cop thriller that has the intonations of a neo-noir mixed in with some iconic figures. The script, in a manner, is much improve than I might have thought, and the actors- stars Robert De Niro and Al Pacino, in a picture technically for the third fourth dimension and for the outset time technically in the frame for more than than a few seconds (a pressure level manifestly from those who whined near their bit at the diner in Rut) equally well equally the likes of Brian Denehey and Carla Gugino- exercise their best to brand it an entertaining ride. And for all of its recycled elements and plot turns and tough-guy take-no-s*** dialog, it's a fun ride for what it'southward worth as far equally substance goes. You want to meet what will happen with these two veteran cop characters as they delve deeper into this killer case (somewhat ripped off from Magnum Force, or something like that in terms of the victims), and what the "twist" will ultimately be.
For those who might call up it tired or stiff, I wouldn't put whatsoever existent arraign on the stars, or fifty-fifty Gerwitz'south (flawed) screenplay, which does occasionally pull off dark and funny barrack and some fibroid dialog and activeness and thrills to the degree that ane saw in his Inside Human being script. The problem generally was the direction; Jon Avnet is not a visionary, nor is he a really well-suited neo-noir managing director. He'due south just a competent technician (if not veerying close to outright hack) enough to dig up a few potent bits or visual touches, and mostly tries to make the movie "hip" and "fresh" and "inventive" with the approach to style in the flashbacks, and he doesn't possibly bypass the pitgalls in Gerwitz's script. What is pleasing, ultimately, about the picture is that it's non bad at all, and is actually a adept picture show. But with characters played past near generational icons dubbed in the film equally "similar Lennon and McCartney", this isn't quite up to their previous snuff together. They deserve just a picayune better with the likes of Godfather 2 and Oestrus to their previous collaborations.
42 out of 69 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A sort of guilty pleasance, past no means bad.
FINALLY! DeNiro! Pacino! Together! For more than one scene! I couldn't wait. I'm also happy to say that, while the film won't be winning any Oscars, it isn't bad by any means, and is certainly an improvement over Pacino and director Jon Avnet's last movie, 88 Minutes. Avnet is growing as a filmmaker, and has learned from by mistakes. Righteous Kill is an acceptable mystery film, and of course, features 2 great performances from 2 of the greatest of all fourth dimension.
Righteous Impale, despite having the 2 leads that it does, is really a managing director's motion picture, and Jon Avnet cloaks the motion-picture show in a black blanket of mystery very well. While the chief plot twist of the moving picture (and oh, there are many of them) is sort of obvious, the fact that in that location'southward more to it than that really helps the moving-picture show and saves information technology from oblivion.
What I liked about about the picture show, still, was the casting of DeNiro in a role Pacino would normally play (the hotheaded cop who simply tin can't seem to keep his oral cavity shut or stop cursing), and Pacino in a role DeNiro would ordinarily play (the reserved, however silently intense friend). The moving-picture show is split up into two parts, each showcasing the talents of one of the legends. Unfortunately, I tin can't really describe the performances in a deep way without coming close to spoilers, merely rest bodacious, both are excellent. John Leguizamo is a nice addition equally a hot headed detective at odds with DeNiro, and Carla Gugino as the heart candy was not a mistake by any means. I have no comment on the inclusion of 50 Cent in this film. Thankfully, he doesn't take a ton of screen time.
The script of the film, on paper, isn't actually good, but in that location's a few techniques that really piece of work on screen, such every bit the main characters' nicknames, and the feeling that almost everyone in the motion picture is bad. I definitely like Avnet a petty more now. DeNiro and Pacino share a wealth of screen time and have a lot of meat to chew on as actors, especially DeNiro, who turns up the intensity and the New York accent (information technology'southward a little stronger here than it normally is). While the film won't become down equally legendary, I recall every fan of both actors will be pleased and will smile at numerous moments merely because these two are playing off each other so frequently, and so well.
My complaints lie with the emotional feel of the film, which I felt wasn't strong enough. I wanted to shed tears in the end, merely for some reason, I couldn't. I won't say the acting in the climax could have been stronger, just had it been done in a different way, I might have liked information technology a bit more than. All in all, Righteous Kill is not a bad flick, as it managed to continue my attending and hold me in suspense for information technology's duration without making me feel frustrated. It definitely requires your total attention, and may even crave a couple of viewings.
111 out of 169 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Makes my middle bleed...
'Righteous Kill' non just disappoints, it's an epic failure. And I mean wanna-dial-everyone-involved failure. Re-watching that one petite coffee-house scene with De Niro and Pacino in 'Heat' will jolt more electricity into yous than this whole waste of celluloid. 'Righteous Kill' is a movie that actually accomplishes to have both De Niro and Pacino manus in a performance so far under their usual level, I'g still in disbelief over it. A healthy suggestion: avert all films past this untalented hack not worthy of the title 'director'. For example, he also made Pacino look bad in the stinker '88 minutes', a directly-to-cable thriller meets 'Phone Booth'.
Shouldn't these 2 legends make use of their gilt years to partake in interesting movies, why doesn't Pacino make another Lumet (see: Canis familiaris 24-hour interval Afternoon) or why not team upward again with Mann over again (Rut). Surely they accept the power to pull the tablecloth toward them when it comes to getting roles in prestigious projects? Why they rather star in a movie that kids 'you can lick my balls any time' is across me.
If you lot think I'thou being as well dramatic, go encounter for yourself just don't come crying to me when you get your heart ripped out and served on a platter as well...
102 out of 152 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pure hokum
I'd heard bad things nigh RIGHTEOUS Kill, but how could any cop thriller teaming up two of the best actors of all time be all that bad? By the fourth dimension it showed upwardly on terrestrial TV, I was all set to give it a sympathetic viewing if only for the pleasure of watching two former heavyweights dorsum on-screen together.
Sadly, what they said about RIGHTEOUS KILL turns out to be truthful: this is a piece of hokum, a badly-scripted and equally poorly-directed case of moving picture-making. Information technology'south so cheap and lacking in incident that the whole flick seems to exist taking identify either in some dimly-lit warehouse or in a dimly-lit police station, and there's no style, no finesse or indeed free energy injected into the proceedings at any signal.
The whole plot hangs on to a lame twist that's so glaringly obvious that y'all wonder how it got by studio bosses - do they really think audiences are this dim? Pacino and De Niro do their all-time with what they've got, but they practise seem faintly embarrassed, equally if they tin tell this is no good and they're in a bustle to get it done and dusted as rapidly as they can. A scattering of interesting supporting actors (including Brian Dennehy) fail to provide inspiration, leaving this a lifeless dud of a movie.
7 out of 9 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Righteous" Waste of Time & Talent!
Alert: Spoilers
"Fried Light-green Tomatoes" director Jon Avnet's new picture show "Righteous Kill" qualifies as far from righteous. This gritty whodunit near corrupt cops with Robert De Niro and Al Pacino suffers from quite perchance the worst screenplay in film history. Some of Jean-Claude Van Damme's straight-to-video martial arts thrillers surpass this nonsense. "Inside Man" scenarist Russell Gewirtz gets it all wrong. Gewirtz takes the "Muddied Harry" sequel "Magnum Force" and rewrites information technology as an Agatha Christie mystery for tough guys. Indeed, threescore-v yr former Robert De Niro quotes "Muddy Harry" at an Internal Affairs hearing when he observes, "Nothing incorrect with a little shooting, every bit long as the correct people go shot." Clearly, De Niro and Pacino made this clunker with its sloppy, incoherent, convoluted, unbelievable script for the bucks. "Righteous Kill" lacks excitement, suspense, and creativity. The eleventh hour revelation of the killer is then incredibly contrived that you wonder how they could take foisted this pathetic potboiler onto movie audiences. Everybody who buys a ticket to watch this tawdry tedium is expecting something as good as--if non improve than--the two previous De Niro & Pacino pictures. Francis Ford Coppola's "The Godfather, Part two" won a Best Moving picture Oscar in 1975, while "Miami Vice" creator Michael Isle of mann's urban crime thriller "Heat" ranks as one of the great law & club epics. Righteous Kill" is, simply put, righteously ill in its criminal abuse of a stellar bandage including Carla Gugino, Brian Dennehy, 50 Cent, John Leguizamo, Barry Primus, and Donnie Wahlberg, not to mention the hour and forty minutes that you'll waste watching it.
"Righteous Kill" involves vigilante justice. Several unsavory citizens die in this R-rated opus. A serial killer guns downwards a black drug dealer (Curtis 'fifty Cent' Jackson), a white rapist (Terry Serpico), a kid killer (Frank John Hughes), a pedophile Cosmic priest (Malachy McCourt) , a pimp, and a Russian wrestler (Oleg Taktarov) in common cold-blood. The aforementioned killer leaves a verse form on a card at each homicide. Talk about poetic justice! Homicide Detectives Thomas Cowan (Robert De Niro) and David Fisk (Al Pacino) have been partners for 30 years in the New York Constabulary Department. An Internal Affairs investigator comments that Cowan & Fisk are closer than Lennon & McCartney. These 2 profane, abrupt-shooting, tough-talking veterans take witnessed the seamy side of life and eventually it affects their mindset. Cowan and Fisk had to stand by helplessly while the courts cleared a child killer from a offense that he committed. A cocky-righteous Cowan plants evidence that convicts the child killer of another crime to put him behind bars. Cowan behaves like "Muddy Harry" and his partner Fisk describes him aptly every bit "a pit-bull on crack." Initially, Cowan and Fisk have no luck communicable the serial killer and Detectives Simon Perez (John Leguizamo of "The Rock") and Ted Riley (Donnie Wahlberg of "Saw 2") bring together their investigation when ane of their cases coincides with our heroes. Cowan and Perez detest each other considering they have been bedding down a nymphomaniacal Crime Scene forensics expert, Karen Corelli (Carla Gugino of "American Gangster"), who loves rough sex activity. No affair what they practice to solve the case, they cannot crack it, until Fisk suggests that the killer is a cop. Cowan suspects a disgruntled cop disrepair off the force has the motive. Meanwhile, the feud betwixt Perez and Cowan fuels Perez'due south conventionalities that Cowan is the murderer. Cowan admits he knew the priest and Lieutenant Hingis (a shrunken looking Brian Dennehy of "Silverado") puts him on a desk and allows the younger detectives to engineer a sting that will expose Cowan. Cowan's partner Fisk laughs in Hingis' face as well at Perez and Fisk.
Things begin to fall into identify when one victim, the Russian, survives the killer's three bullets and the N.Y.P.D. guards his hospital room. The best mysteries requite audiences the chance to figure them out. "Righteous Kill" deprives united states crucial background cloth that would take made it far easier to fathom the killer's identity. Instead, Gewirtz and Avnet care for us to scenes where our heroes rarely go into whatever dangerous predicaments. Avnet stages a clumsy shoot out in an African-American nightspot, but every time somebody dies in "Righteous Kill" the criminal offence is shown from the killer'southward perspective. Repeatedly, what you don't see and what you're not told about the protagonists keeps you in the dark. For instance, we know De Niro and Pacino'southward characters only by their nicknames. The filmmakers reject to establish the identities of either De Niro or Pacino from the showtime. The criminal investigation takes weird turns and red herrings—things designed to distract u.s.—announced everywhere. Actually, the best clue to the killer's identity is broached early on in the action, simply yous won't pay whatever attention to information technology because it seems to take little relevance.
Goggle box serial like CBS-Television receiver's 3 "C.South.I." shows make this big-budget Hollywood whodunit await sophomoric. At 1 betoken, Lt. Hingis asks our heroes if they want to retire because they aren't making any headway. Neither Cowan nor Fisk are prepared to back down from this challenge, even if it ways disaster for them. In that moment, De Niro and Pacino bear similar 'Grumpy One-time Cops' out to solve one terminal crime. Watching "Righteous Kill" volition give you a bad case of the North.Y.P.D. Dejection.
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mediocre flick with great acting
It is what you would expect from Al Pacino and Robert De Niro. They've been doing these kind of roles for the past 30 years of their acting life. Applause, merely no surprise there.
The film itself was not a blast. Totally predictable plot, stereotype good cop bad cop, drug dealers, bad neighborhood were huge minus to this movie. Lack of grapheme development fabricated the film implausible and some parts inconvicible no matter how great the interim was. Finally, the managing director's abuse of dramatic music without much happening throughout the film slowly eats abroad your patience.
Six out of ten is what I volition requite, 3 from Al Pacino and iii from Robert De Niro.
134 out of 187 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Is this movie a requiem for the careers of 2 Hollywood legends?
Does this moving picture mark the beginning of the terminate of the careers of 2 Hollywood legends? Are they finished as major Hollywood stars? Is this the best that Hollywood can offering them? If it is then let us conduct a requiem for their careers. Why practise this? 1 reason: this movie. As soon as the pic starts information technology becomes immediately credible that it is a clunker. The acting is uninspiring, tepid at best. Robert De Niro and Al Pacino are almost laughably unconvincing in their roles as two police officers with something to hibernate. Or maybe nothing to hide. At no point does this movie fifty-fifty come shut to generating the level of intensity that makes for a good who-done-information technology. This movie is every bit dull equally a butter knife, every bit bland every bit spice-free food, and as empty as a dried-up well. Zilch tin can save this picture show from its inevitable demise to DVD-land and even there it might not do too well. This movie is nigh as heady as a lump of cheese. It challenges the audience to stay awake. Information technology tries to peddle a story based solely on the presence of 2 Hollywood stars who practice piddling to save the story. This motion picture also seems to take an ax to grind regarding retirement. For some reason, the creators of this movie take repeated shots at the idea of retirement, as if it is something to be avoided. So for anyone who is contemplating retirement or is already retired, expect out and agree on to your 401K or your defines pension plan. Is at that place life after retirement? To find the answer to this question, do not, repeat, Do NOT, watch this movie. One other point, this is the first motion-picture show this commentator tin can recall in which not one but TWO major Hollywood stars take a cinematic dive. Both wait tired and both act tired and so, to paraphrase those words of wisdom, if they look tired and act tired so then they must exist tired ... and who wants to pay coin to lookout tired actors?
73 out of 140 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You tried to entertain me and this is how you do it??
For me, this declining endeavor to bring together to the screen two acting legends, Academy Honour winners Robert De Niro and Al Pacino, is reminiscent of the equally disastrous projection from few years agone, The Monster in Law for which some other legend, Jane Fonda came our of the retirement. While watching her and then called one-act, I kept thinking, is THAT what she picked upward for her come dorsum? While watching Righteous Kill with De Niro and Pacino, for well-nigh every of its very long 103 minutes I thought, y'all guys better bask retirement than choose the projection similar this.
Why are the ending results of both attempts so disappointing? Why do we have the comedy that is not funny and the thriller that does not thrill. Watching Richteous Kill, You lot would think that the matrimony of two brilliant actors would save a weak, mediocre, simply non interesting in all departments pic but information technology did not happen. Instead of post-obit rather predictable plot, I kept looking at the actors who have given us so many moments of joy and thinking to myself, no, information technology is non Serpico, nor ...And Justice for All, no Taxi Driver, nor Heat, nor The Sea of Love. What was it? What about the twists that I figured after ten minutes into the movie? What was well-nigh the ending that easily could win an accolade for the most ridiculous, preposterous, and stupidest scene that involves two Oscar winners ever. I love Crime /Thriller/Mystery mixed with the drama. Those are among my favorites and I am not likewise picky. As long as the movie is clever, well acted, keeps me guessing and entertains me, I am happy. It is not the case with Righteous Kill, and even two stars can't salve information technology. Ironically, the nigh memorable scene for me was De Niro (Turk) quoting Muddied Harry, "At that place's goose egg wrong with a little shooting, as long as the right people go shot." It made me think about Clint Eastwood. How did he manage to direct himself last year in his own film at the historic period of 78, and to get in a fantastic poignant movie that apparently salutes to his most love character Dirty Harry Callahan, tells the story in the best traditions that seem lost nowadays, and ends on a high and moving note. The film with two great actors should be a cinematic event, non a laughing stock. I'd suggest De Niro and Pacino contact Eastwood and endeavour to practice a flick together or even crazier idea - to remake Righteous Kill with Woody Allen or Brothers Coen. I would be first in line to see whatsoever of these three hypothetical movies during the starting time weekend.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flaccid, predictable, shallow, irksome
Alarm: Spoilers
Shameful.
So many people are wondering, on this thread, WHY do some great actors, as Pacino and De Niro, accept such compromises. I must confess that today, at the press viewing, nearly of my colleagues, the all-time film critics from Romania, were remarking about the same thing. Of course, we know why they do it - not necessarily by greed. They have contracts, obligations, all kind of sundry reasons to accept such routine work in movies with zip value.
The script here is very awkwardly written, with a messy structure and a total lack of dramatism. Even worse, information technology's completely anticipated. The intended "fake pb" meant to deliberately confuse the audition is so transparent, that everybody tin gauge from the first fifteen minutes the and then-called "theater coup" in the end - and and so, while waiting for it, friends and neighbors, what a bore! Limp pacing, flaccid storytelling, an absolute impotence in building-upwards the suspense... And as if this wasn't enough, the final scene is impossibly prolonged, diluted and tacky...
By the fashion, did you know that even cracking artists like De Niro and Pacino can act Badly? In this all-over failure, they are outright unbearable! Their characters are simplistic, uninteresting, shallow, and then the poor big stars apace autumn into what became their worst mannerisms - Bob De Niro, mainly, so full of grimaces and squinting... Even Jack Nicholson, in "The Bucket Listing", was an itty fragmentary better! A slice of advice: if you really HAVE to view this, carry on a thermos full of hard biting strong java. AND ear-plugs, not to hear the snoring all effectually you.
164 out of 284 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Contrived and Clichéd
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a very contrived vehicle for Robert De Niro and Al Pacino with almost nothing to recommend it that I could discern. It contains every cop movie cliché in the book, lots of 'manly' dialogue and ends with our two cop buddies spouting deathbed philosophy.
On a broad calibration, movies come in 3 sorts;
1. Stories that merely accept to written, because they demand to be told. Frequently these are based on real events. Then someone thinks virtually how to put information technology on screen and who might exist good actors to cast in the various roles.
2. The truly vivid, memorable imaginings of someone actually artistic who wants to construct an entertaining fantasy. Then, as in number ane, someone thinks about who might be expert actors to bandage in the various roles.
three. Highly contrived (and oft unlikely) vehicles for Big Names, who desire to make another moving picture, and may have convinced a studio exec that they can fill a few seats in movie houses. And get paid a lot.
In other words, in ane and two the story comes first and in three, the thespian comes offset. I'm a big fan of the starting time 2, and very dubious virtually the third. And I'g afraid Righteous Kill comes squarely in category 3. I didn't actually hate information technology, but it overwhelmed me with indifference. And I used to honey these guys!
De Niro (Turk) and Pacino (Rooster) – and even the names put me off – are 2 veteran (very veteran, but more of that later on) New York cops. They are working a case which appears to involve a series killer who has set up himself upwards as judge and jury to accept out the nasty people the courts let off. They may or may non have put the wrong person away for a murder some years earlier. The sticky, serial killer, finger of guilt is pointing inexorably to it existence one of their own, a cop. Information technology's really but a instance of staying awake long enough to establish which i of our tough guy, anti-heroes it is.
At present it seemed so blindingly obvious to me within the first half an hour who the guilty party was, that I thought it must be a double barefaced. Yous know, it's then obviously 10, that it must really exist Y, but, hey, that's too simple besides and then really it's X after all only we're supposed to remember it's Y etc. But no. Information technology really was that simple. It was X all the time, and any double barefaced was merely my over-agile imagination striving to go along me interested. (Although I will say in the movie'due south defence force that my spouse didn't 'go it' until the very end. Unfortunately that may say more about him than information technology does about the movie! He'd had a tough week at work.)
I hate to have to say this, but De Niro and Pacino are simply as well old to assuredly play tough guys any more. Pacino bears a passing resemblance to Keith Richards these days, and although De Niro may have weathered slightly improve, I kept thinking every bit I watched this, that no studio would ever cast two grizzled women in their sixties as street wise cops, so why am I ( a grizzled adult female in my 50s) supposed to find these two guys disarming? The female characters are the usual run of obviously merely virtuous, weeping rape victims and semi-clothed quasi hookers, beloved of tough guy cop movies, except for the token CSI copette Karen Corelli (Carla Gugino) who is, of course, a stunner. (She appears both clothed and semi clothed.)
Nosotros encounter very piddling of her professional bent, but our Karen loves nothing more than than a bit of crude sexual practice with Turk and as there are but some 28 years between Gugino and De Niro, I should probably exist grateful she wasn't bonking Rooster. In one particularly gratuitous scene Karen gets sexually aroused by Turks' vivid description of the violence inflicted on a suspect, which is doubtless intended to get that vital eighteen-30 male person demographic giggling, only should really accept the whole NYC female police corps out on strike in protest. At the vital moment she loses her bottle and can't shoot the bad guy.
Sigh…………… I but find such sexist tripe and then irksome these days. I tin can't imagine where my sense of sense of humour went? I hateful it was funny the first 2 or iii hundred times I saw it. In motion picture after movie. But at present? No cheers.
Definitely 2 thumbs down for this clichéd, hackneyed, tedious B flick. De Niro and Pacino, do you actually need the money THAT much?
eighteen out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lame and Disappointing Screenplay and Management
In New York, the veteran NYPD detectives and partners Turk (Robert De Niro) and Rooster (Al Pacino) hunt a serial-killer that kills criminals, leaving a poem with the corpses. When Detectives Simon Perez (John Leguizamo) and Ted Riley (Donnie Wahlberg) join the investigation, they suspect that Turk is the killer.
"Righteous Kill" is probably the greatest disappointment I have had this yr. The lame and mediocre screenplay and direction achieve the impossible, wasting Al Pacino and Robert De Niro together performing NYPD Detectives. It is incredible how a writer and a managing director can be then incompetent! My vote is v.
Title (Brazil): "As Duas Faces da Lei" ("The Two Faces of the Police")
11 out of 21 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Been waiting xiii years for another De Niro/Pacino picture, and this is how they deliver??!!
Alarm: Spoilers
***Small Insignificant Spoilers***
What a disappointment. People have been waiting since "Rut" in '95 for another flick where Pacino and De Niro co-star and this is what us loyal fans are given? Unacceptable, you take 2 of the greatest actors playing side past side and yous give them this anticipated and twisted script? WHHYYY!!?? If they were going to make another De Niro/Pacino flick they should've made it fantastic. This is mediocre. First off, why in name of all that is holy would they include l cent in a De Niro/Pacino movie. Who does that? It'due south equally if they are purposefully lowering the value of this movie. Dominion number i when making movies with classic actors - don't use ghetto gilded tooth untalented rappers equally filler actors, use expert ones. Heat was full of expert actors who played their parts well and spoke clearly, unlike the infamous "fitty".
The story is very bad. It's too twisted and nonsensical. It's similar to Street Kings, which is a very bad affair. Pacino and De Niro human activity well, just non what you'd expect from these kind of actors. Information technology's not entirely their fault, it's non easy making a rusty script shine even if yous've been acting for 30 years.
The music is pretty proficient. It sets the proper moods for near of the situations so it adds a little realism to the movie. The action is pretty weak. Heat was full of intense, unpredictable, and suspenseful action. This moving-picture show has predictable, poorly filmed action.
Now, here comes the spoiler, to those who saw Oestrus. The catastrophe is exactly the same as in Estrus just the other thespian gets killed this time. Honestly, could they get any more desperate that they have to copy the ending of a archetype to brand the ending of a bad movie slightly better. What'southward fifty-fifty sadder is that information technology didn't brand anything amend, especially if you lot're a Heat fan.
Conclusion: If they wanted to brand another De Niro/Pacino movie the writers and manager should take tried much harder to make another classic as proficient if not improve than Oestrus, or they should never take tried in the first place. It's insulting. You should scout it just to judge for yourself only don't get your hopes upwardly.
ten out of 13 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thwarting
One word, no, actually, ii words to draw this film: TOTAL Disappointment (obviously for Robert Deniro and Al Pacino). If you're a fan of these two actors, and films like Estrus, I recommend you Non to see this film. And if you do, expect the worst (mayhap that style you won't be that disappointed). The acting was deplorable but the worst function: the roles they play, they don't fit with their age. Tell me, how can a 68 year sometime or a 65 year former be a cop, lift weights, try to go far a fight with 30ish year former guys, spring a argue and non intermission both knees?? It doesn't fit, it doesn't expect absurd, it looks ridiculous and disappointing! I mean c'mon, learn from actors like Anthony Hopkins, he is 70 and withal does films that kicking donkey similar Fracture. He doesn't go running, fighting or annihilation like that, in the contrary, he does films that FIT HIS Age! Anyways, this is simply my opinion...
113 out of 164 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
De Niro and Pacino make it a skillful movie
This film has a lot of problem, only the great performances of its stars even so go far worth seeing at the theater. The twist was way too predictable (I had it solved half an hour in, and I'm usually unable to figure out twists style ahead of time) and the script wasn't very impressive. The management is OK, simply cipher special. At that place were some pretty funny moments and one liners though. The only thing that makes this better than a sub-par thriller is De Niro and Pacino, both of whom put in cracking performances and really save this movie. The supporting actors do only fine, but are overshadowed. I was actually anxious for a pic in which the pair finally share some pregnant screen time together, and this movie was about equally good as could be expected, considering the makers of the film.
It isn't the best flick out right at present (endeavor Burn Afterwards Reading), but I do recommend going to meet this ane. I give it vii/10. I promise Robert De Niro and Al Pacino squad upwards again, hopefully with a better screenplay and manager.
46 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clichéd simply occasionally entertaining De Niro/Pacino neo-noir
Warning: Spoilers
'Righteous Kill' represents a big foot forward for screenwriter Russell Gewirtz whose rookie try, 'Inside Man', was a story about a banking concern heist that had little brownie. The plot of 'Righteous Kill', however, is modestly clever. A vigilante serial killer is on the loose in New York Metropolis, murdering diverse criminals. His calling bill of fare is a rhymed poem left at each criminal offence scene. De Niro (Turk) and Pacino (Rooster) play the 2 aging detectives assigned to solve the instance. De Niro is seen throughout on a surveillance tape seemingly 'confessing' to committing the murders. Only in a twist at the stop of the story, his confession turns out to be forced and information technology ends upwards that Pacino is actually the murderer all along.
Before arriving at the film'southward climax, we learn that Turk planted evidence on a murderer who got off on a technicality and as a result the criminal is sent off to jail. A skillful part of the moving-picture show chronicles how each of the bad guys are dispatched by the vigilante. The main bad guy is a drug dealer played past 50 Cent who is convincingly menacing. An early unconvincing scene involves Turk and Rooster sending a pretty coke-addicted lawyer to the drug dealer's lair, wearing a wire, and trying to entrap him. The drug dealer sees through the ruse right away and the lawyer is shot past the drug dealer'due south bodyguard (but somewhen survives). Why veteran detectives would identify an amateur informant in such like shooting fish in a barrel jeopardy doesn't band true. There'south a subplot involving a sexy Offense Scene Investigator who is simultaneously bedding Turk and Perez, a younger detective (played by John Leguizamo). Perez and his partner Riley (played by Donnie Wahlberg) come to the decision that it's one of their own who has been committing the murders.
Various posters hither take pointed to deficiencies in the script including that De Niro and Pacino are too onetime for their parts, in that location's a lack of grapheme development (also many good cop/bad cop clichés), a lack of suspense and scenes that are repetitious. Ane poster suggested that the characters needed to have a softer side but I call up information technology was the director's intent to keep the entire story as nighttime as possible. The constant use of the moody soundtrack throughout almost of the picture show compensated for the lack of emotional depth of the characters. Was this a expert matter? I don't know. Just clearly the music added to the film's 'neo-noir' feel.
'Righteous Impale' will probably practise fairly well at the box office if one factors in the potential global market place. This is really a noir version of 'Dirty Harry' and those who love having their stick-figure bad guys brought to justice without putting upward a fight, will exist fatigued to his type of film. And then there's De Niro and Pacino. De Niro nigh ever channels the same character--a hot-headed gangster type (I was so much reminded of his performance in 'Analyze This', although that's a comedy). Moviegoers ever want to pay coin to see De Niro even though he unremarkably coughs up the aforementioned shtick. Pacino nonetheless is much more subdued in this moving picture until the end. But and so does he allow his over the top persona to come out. Really that was the intent of the screenwriter; the audience is led to believe that De Niro is the hot head and Pacino is the reasonable 1. Pacino keeps De Niro "in check' throughout the film until the ending.
Although many claimed they 'figured out' the twist ending 30 minutes into the picture show, I must confess that I didn't come across it coming. But once it was revealed I didn't really purchase the reversal since information technology was inconsistent with the fashion the character arc had adult. Pacino's 'Rooster' has noble motives for offing the bad guys. Simply suddenly, when the sexy CSI gal is most to betrayal him, he viciously attacks her. It merely seemed totally out of grapheme for this noble 'Dirty Harry' character to suddenly decompensate and assault a adult female. What 'noble' criminal would do such a thing? Rooster's explanation is that he became disappointed with Turk after Turk planted evidence on the murderer who got off on a technicality. He had 'looked up' to Turk only now the image of him existence a noble cop had been destroyed. Somehow he at present becomes a vigilante serial killer because his partner no longer 'went by the volume'. This is his caption every bit to why he becomes unhinged which leads his partner of 30 years to shoot him to decease. If you believe in this motive, then you'll believe that the portrait of the New York Metropolis Police force Section as depicted in this film is a realistic one.
When all is said and done, we never go a feel for Turk and Rooster as flesh and blood homo beings. There is little 'back story' to 'Righteous Kill' and that applies to all the characters. 'Righteous Impale" remains a modestly entertaining detective mystery with little graphic symbol development and chiefly relying on the hitting or miss semi-comic banter betwixt two aging Hollywood legends.
six out of ten found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A serial killer that the police can requite a medal to
(Synopsis) Turk (Robert De Niro) and Rooster (Al Pacino) are partners in the NYPD Homicide Sectionalization. They have 30 years of service investigating murders, and earlier they pull the pin, they want to solve their last big example. The city has a serial killer who is targeting criminals who have gotten away with rape, murder, and other heinous crimes. The serial killer believes that he is helping the police by taking the scum of the globe out of guild for proficient, never to hurt any law abiding citizens again. The serial killer shoots the criminal at very close-range and leaves a four-line poem justifying the execution. Turk and Rooster desire to requite this person a medal, merely instead, they must arrest him before he kills again.
(My Annotate) Robert De Niro and Al Pacino are excellent as New York City police detectives on the trail of a series killer, in this psychological thriller. They play off each other effortlessly. The plot has several twists and turns, and you lot may recollect that you have figured out who the serial killer is in the showtime 15 minutes, just you lot could be wrong. You volition like the poems that are left at the crime scene, and at that place are some good one-liners. I just love the fact that Robert De Niro and Al Pacino finally got a take a chance to play in the aforementioned movie over again. The performances of Carla Gugino and John Legnizamo were also amazing. The interim is so adept that the fourth dimension flies by. You must see this movie! (Overture Films, Run Time 1:xl, Rated R) (10/10)
30 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a crime thriller thats way underrated !
Warning: Spoilers
this film is brilliant. its a take a chance to run across De Niro and Pacino together in film. unlike the unforgettable masterpiece Heat, where at that place only in one shot through the whole film. now don't heed to the reviews, i really think the reason this film has some bad reviews is because critics were expecting more than because Deniro and Pacino are in it. if the two leads were non them then i recall the rating would be much higher.
the picture show has a brilliant cast. plain the two leads practice a brilliant job but the co-stars are also very proficient. John Leguizamo, Donnie Wahlberg and Carla Gugino are amongst the strong co-stars. John Leguizamo is a bright histrion. i loved him in Summertime Of Sam and Spun. Donnie Wahlberg has also surprised me in his roles in the saw films.
the story is basically set around two cops (Turk and Rooster) on the verge of retirement and they have a large homicide case ahead of them. once they start investigating you see that this case has a big story behind it. such every bit cop corruption
this film is really well made and had me glued. the twist's in this film are remarkable and has a lot of originality to it.... brilliant...... 10/x......j.d Seaton
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
They OWN the movie
Virtually people (including yours truly) are anxious to see this film cause its been 13 years since the two screen legends have appeared in the same motion-picture show. First and Foremost the movie delivers on the hype. Deniro is there and Pacino is in that location n from the start till the end they Ain the movie.
The motion-picture show's strong point is that the 2 legends are back to the their roots .Witty wise cracks ,acme notch swearing ,drugs and violence. Pacino is equally brilliant as he was in his previous movies but when compared to estrus he dosen't show the same energy that he did. DeNiro on the other paw was everything that made him what he is today . One of the immortals Deniro kicks a$$ and with Pacino at that place the duo literally tear the movie apart . Its superb.
As far equally the story goes the plot was zero new only the twists and turns are highly innovative . Its like a an old lxx's crime story with more modern elements. Curtis Jackson surprisingly did an above average job despite the fact that I thought that he would screw up. Withal when talking about the other interim its just bland cause you lot know why.
Overall an enjoyable film. Definitely worth watching at least once. But I withal feel that these guys accept a lot left in them and I am eagerly waiting for them to team up again for another movie.
64 out of 117 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
awful!
Warning: Spoilers
Unaware of any previous reviews I went forth with an open up mind. The talent list is impressive and the title engaging. Nothing could exist further from the truth. A picture show where fiddy cent is a meliorate actor than the two headliners with a fixed facial expression, is destined to fail and it does.
This is not a weak film, it is simply bad. Right from the basic building blocks similar editing and product. The script is wearisome with three funny bits saved for the two other cops (who are the all-time actors by far). The acting is awful and I felt that Pacino and De Niro never had the eye for it. Indeed I would say that they did this in their lunch breaks whilst doing other, more worthy, films.
Words don't really exercise justice to how laughable this movie was. A huge disappointment, the plot and the motives made no sense, the characterizations was useless and the swearing was totally unnecessary and the ending in the warehouse was simply stupid. Really? Who did not guess that Pacino was the man!!! Avoid like the plague.
thirteen out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1034331/reviews
0 Response to "Who Is the Killer in Righteous Kill Review"
Post a Comment